Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 06:29

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some dirty secrets of Indian (Bollywood, etc.) actors and actresses?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
FDA approves HIV drug based on University of Utah biochemist's findings - KSL News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
10 Must-See Movies at the 2025 Tribeca Festival - IndieWire
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
What did someone say to you that instantly made you realize their life was in danger?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Can I bring a tub of whey protein to the airport?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Zika Virus Is Back After 6 Years in One of the Most Popular U.S. Tourist Destinations - AOL.com